Re: Hot Backup

From: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
To: Andrew Sullivan <andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info>
Cc: "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Hot Backup
Date: 2002-10-24 14:42:00
Message-ID: 1035470520.12582.7.camel@camel
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

I think you missed the part of the thread where the nuclear bomb hit the
data center. hmm... maybe it wasn't a nuclear bomb, but it was getting
there. :-)

BTW - I believe we'll have real PITR in 7.4, about 6 months away.

Robert Treat

On Tue, 2002-10-22 at 10:34, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 09:40:44AM -0400, Robert Treat wrote:
>
> > Is it me or do doomsdays scenarios sometimes seem a little silly? I'd
>
> Not if your contract requires five-nines reliablility and no more
> than 180 minutes of downtime _ever_. Is five-nines realistic? For
> most purposes, probably not, according to recent pronouncements (see,
> e.g. <http://www.bcr.com/bcrmag/2002/05/p22.asp>). But it's in
> lots of contracts anyway.
>
> > like to ask just where are you storing your "incremental backups" with
> > Oracle/m$ sql ?? If it's on the same drive, then when you drive craps
>
> The more or less standard way of doing this is to stream the
> PITR-required stuff to another device on another controller -- lots
> of people stream to tape. People have been doing this for ages,
> partly because disks used to be (a) expensive and (b) unreliable.
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeffrey Melloy 2002-10-24 14:50:08 Re: Perl DBD::Pg problem
Previous Message Fernando Papa 2002-10-24 13:57:51 heap_blks_hit and heap_blks_read

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ben McMahan 2002-10-24 20:09:00 Turning the PLANNER off
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-10-24 14:23:29 Re: Using the same condition twice