| From: | Karl DeBisschop <kdebisschop(at)alert(dot)infoplease(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: elog() proposal |
| Date: | 2002-02-24 12:42:12 |
| Message-ID: | 1014554538.24684.1.camel@miles.debisschop.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, 2002-02-23 at 12:04, Tom Lane wrote:
> Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org> writes:
> > I'm with Peter on this one; let's find another more neutral name.
>
> Proposals then? What's been used or bandied about so far are
> "REALLYFATAL" (yuck, even though I take the blame for it).
> "STOP" (Vadim put this in, but I object to it as being too vague;
> it's not at all obvious that it's worse than FATAL).
> "FATALALL" (also yuck).
>
> Surely we can find something that's short, memorable, and clearly
> a notch more fatal than FATAL.
PANIC ?
--
Karl DeBisschop <kdebisschop(at)alert(dot)infoplease(dot)com>
The Learning Network / Reference
www.learningnetwork.com / www.infoplease.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-02-24 12:46:12 | Re: elog() proposal |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2002-02-24 06:10:15 | Re: Duration of beta period |