Re: elog() proposal

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Karl DeBisschop <kdebisschop(at)alert(dot)infoplease(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: elog() proposal
Date: 2002-02-24 16:58:35
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.30.0202241157180.686-100000@peter.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Karl DeBisschop writes:

> PANIC ?

PANIC tells you *absolutely nothing* about what is going to happen.
Let's stop being cute and use something descriptive. It's not like we'll
need to use it every four lines.

--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message John Gray 2002-02-24 17:40:30 My "TOAST slicing" patch -explanation
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-02-24 16:57:19 Re: elog() proposal