Re: elog() proposal

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: elog() proposal
Date: 2002-02-23 17:04:38
Message-ID: 25036.1014483878@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org> writes:
> I'm with Peter on this one; let's find another more neutral name.

Proposals then? What's been used or bandied about so far are
"REALLYFATAL" (yuck, even though I take the blame for it).
"STOP" (Vadim put this in, but I object to it as being too vague;
it's not at all obvious that it's worse than FATAL).
"FATALALL" (also yuck).

Surely we can find something that's short, memorable, and clearly
a notch more fatal than FATAL.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2002-02-23 17:16:14 Re: elog() proposal
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-02-23 16:53:24 Re: Storage Location Patch Proposal for V7.3