Re: Desktop integration

From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: Raphaël Enrici <blacknoz(at)club-internet(dot)fr>
Cc: <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>, <jm(at)poure(dot)com>, <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Desktop integration
Date: 2003-09-02 11:20:35
Message-ID: 03AF4E498C591348A42FC93DEA9661B844B56F@mail.vale-housing.co.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgadmin-hackers

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Raphaël Enrici [mailto:blacknoz(at)club-internet(dot)fr]
> Sent: 01 September 2003 22:44
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de; jm(at)poure(dot)com;
> pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Desktop integration
>
>
> Hi Dave,
>
> Dave Page wrote:
>
> > Hi Raphael, I have added the file as pkg/debian/desktop with 2
> > changes:
>
> Ok, if it is in pkg/debian it should be named "pgadmin3.menu" to help
> automate the installation with debhelper scripts, is it hard
> to rename
> the file in CVS ? If yes, I'll do the trick "manually" in the
> build process.

Renamed.

> Sounds good to me, but then may be we should leave it in
> "tools" instead
> of "databases" entry. Although I prefer "Databases", "tools" is a
> section I found from a scratch install it was not the case of
> "databases" which I added by hand. What do you think ?

Hmm, I have neither on KDE 3.1 on Slackware 9. Closest I have is Development. Thoughts anyone? Should it be standardised or distro specific?

Regards, Dave.

Browse pgadmin-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Page 2003-09-02 12:01:21 Beta2?
Previous Message Raphaël Enrici 2003-09-01 22:13:51 French translation correction