From: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
---|---|
To: | "Mark Perez" <mperez(at)whgrp(dot)com>, "pgadmin support" <pgadmin-support(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: CVS server ? |
Date: | 2003-07-03 19:37:50 |
Message-ID: | 03AF4E498C591348A42FC93DEA9661B844B20C@mail.vale-housing.co.uk |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgadmin-support |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mark Perez [mailto:mperez(at)whgrp(dot)com]
> Sent: 03 July 2003 20:26
> To: Dave Page; John Bercik; pgadmin support
> Subject: Re: [pgadmin-support] CVS server ?
>
>
> Hello,
>
> I am having a problem when I import and export a table from
> Access 97 after making a change in pgadmin. There are many
> tables in my database that i utilize and I need the interface
> with Access 97.
>
> Is there a reason that Access 97 does not recognize the
> database "after" changes have been made in pgadmin, ie, add a
> column, field, etc.?
>
> If anyone has this answer, or knows someone who does, please
> let me know.
This is a little off topic for this list (pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org is a
better place for Access help), but iirc, Access only examines the table
structure when you initially link it - from that point on it's assumes
to stay the same. Therefore after you change a table you must relink it.
Regards, Dave.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andreas Pflug | 2003-07-03 20:40:43 | Re: Windows 2000 Server and PostgreSQL |
Previous Message | Mark Perez | 2003-07-03 19:26:22 | Re: CVS server ? |