Re: pgadmin3 property pages design rules

From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: "Andreas Pflug" <Andreas(dot)Pflug(at)web(dot)de>, <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pgadmin3 property pages design rules
Date: 2003-05-02 16:00:09
Message-ID: 03AF4E498C591348A42FC93DEA9661B825A063@mail.vale-housing.co.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgadmin-hackers

Sounds good. I've saved this in a new /notes directory.

Regards, Dave.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andreas Pflug [mailto:Andreas(dot)Pflug(at)web(dot)de]
> Sent: 02 May 2003 16:47
> To: pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: [pgadmin-hackers] pgadmin3 property pages design rules
>
>
> As a proposal, this are the sizes and positions I used so far
> in dlgUser
> and dlgDatabase:
>
> - first control at (10, 10)
> - Standard controls are at (100, y) size (200, 20)
> - vertical control spacing 25, for radio buttons and checkboxes 20
> - static text has a vertical offset of 3 relative to other controls
> - Button size is (60, 25) for OK/Cancel, (75, 25) for more text
> - controls including statics will need up to 50 % more room
> for GTK than
> with Win32
>
> For dialogs derived from dlgSecurityProperty, the Security
> page will be
> created dynamically.
> All dialogs will inherit the SQL page from dlgProperty.
>
>
> Regards,
> Andreas
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of
> broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an
> appropriate subscribe-nomail command to
> majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your message can get through
> to the mailing list cleanly
>

Browse pgadmin-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andreas Pflug 2003-05-02 16:14:12 Re: Unique constraints
Previous Message Andreas Pflug 2003-05-02 15:46:33 pgadmin3 property pages design rules