Re: Refactoring of command.c

It will, but I've always been able to make the assumption it won't be
compiled in as the make files always specified exactly which ones to
compile (and would ignore the new 'stray').

Perhaps the best way to approach this would be to ask the FreeBSD
'repo' people what they do -- as they do this kind of stuff quite
frequently.
--
Rod Taylor

This message represents the official view of the voices in my head

----- Original Message -----
From: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Rod Taylor" <rbt(at)zort(dot)ca>
Cc: "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>; "Peter Eisentraut"
<peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>; "John Gray" <jgray(at)azuli(dot)co(dot)uk>;
<pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 10:13 AM
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Refactoring of command.c

> "Rod Taylor" <rbt(at)zort(dot)ca> writes:
> > A simple copy works quite well. Bit of a waste of space but you
> > preserve the history in both locations.
>
> If you do that, the copied file will appear to CVS to be part of
older
> versions, no?
>
> regards, tom lane
>