Re: Re: List response time...

From: "Mitch Vincent" <mvincent(at)cablespeed(dot)com>
To: "PostgreSQL Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: List response time...
Date: 2001-08-21 21:23:51
Message-ID: 010001c12a87$92ab3590$1251000a@mitch
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


I've had great luck with Postfix as well.

-Mitch

----- Original Message -----
From: "Ian Lance Taylor" <ian(at)airs(dot)com>
To: "Lamar Owen" <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org>
Cc: "Serguei Mokhov" <sa_mokho(at)alcor(dot)concordia(dot)ca>; "PostgreSQL Hackers"
<pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 4:24 PM
Subject: [HACKERS] Re: List response time...

> Note that the postgresql.org mail server is still running sendmail.
> In my personal experience with sources.redhat.com, qmail is a much
> better choice to handle large mailing lists. When we switched from
> sendmail to qmail, mailing list delays dropped from hours, or
> sometimes even days, to seconds.
>
> Ian
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/search.mpl
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ned Wolpert 2001-08-21 21:27:04 Re: JDBC changes for 7.2... some questions...
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2001-08-21 21:14:06 RE: Locale by default?