Re: Sourceforge PG crash

Ahhh...

The strong record of stability tempts even the most cautious user into an
early upgrade.
PostgreSQL clearly needs to introduce more instabilities and bugs in the
beta's. I'll be submitting some patches shorty.

August

----- Original Message -----
From: "The Hermit Hacker" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
To: "August Zajonc" <junk-postgre(at)aontic(dot)com>
Cc: <bigdisk(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>; <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Sent: Sunday, April 22, 2001 1:14 AM
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Sourceforge PG crash

>
> They were running a Beta2, or something like that, database and were even
> warned against it by several of us ... I don't know if they ever upgraded
> to the full release, but, considering the size of Sourceforge, I'm
> doubting it, since its only been a week ... then again, maybe they used
> the crash as an opportunity?
>
> On Fri, 20 Apr 2001, August Zajonc wrote:
>
> > http://sourceforge.net/forum/forum.php?forum_id=80610
> >
> > Be interesting to get some more details on this. Sourceforge is one of
more
> > visable PG sites out there...
> >
> > AZ
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> > TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
> >
> > http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
> >
>
> Marc G. Fournier ICQ#7615664 IRC Nick:
Scrappy
> Systems Administrator @ hub.org
> primary: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org secondary:
scrappy(at){freebsd|postgresql}.org
>
>