Re: And Furthermore. Was: PSQL Working, but PGAccess Not Connecting.

From: "David Lloyd-Jones" <david(dot)lloyd-jones(at)attcanada(dot)ca>
To: "David Lloyd-Jones" <david(dot)lloyd-jones(at)netcom(dot)ca>, "Lamar Owen" <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org>, "Thomas Lockhart" <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
Cc: <pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Oliver Elphick" <olly(at)lfix(dot)co(dot)uk>
Subject: Re: And Furthermore. Was: PSQL Working, but PGAccess Not Connecting.
Date: 2000-08-02 02:46:35
Message-ID: 001c01bffc2b$e5800970$cf597bd8@WORKGROUP
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-interfaces


"David Lloyd-Jones" <david(dot)lloyd-jones(at)netcom(dot)ca> wrote:
> How can this be? Isn't this a contradiction of some sort?

Contradiction. so what else is new?

But while I'm at it, I wonder if anybody knows why directories are named
"rc.d" and "init.d"?

Init seems clear enough, and rc might be resource, I suppose. What's the .d,
or what happened to a, b, and c?

-dlj.

Responses

Browse pgsql-interfaces by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Sawtell 2000-08-02 06:46:07 Re: Re: And Furthermore. Was: PSQL Working, but PGAccess Not Connecting.
Previous Message David Lloyd-Jones 2000-08-02 02:43:25 And Furthermore. Was: PSQL Working, but PGAccess Not Connecting.