From: | "David Lloyd-Jones" <david(dot)lloyd-jones(at)attcanada(dot)ca> |
---|---|
To: | "Lamar Owen" <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org>, "Thomas Lockhart" <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu> |
Cc: | "David Lloyd-Jones" <david(dot)lloyd-jones(at)attcanada(dot)ca>, <pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Oliver Elphick" <olly(at)lfix(dot)co(dot)uk> |
Subject: | And Furthermore. Was: PSQL Working, but PGAccess Not Connecting. |
Date: | 2000-08-02 02:43:25 |
Message-ID: | 000f01bffc2b$71cbd400$cf597bd8@WORKGROUP |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-interfaces pgsql-novice |
"Lamar Owen" <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org> wrote:
>
> [I'm going to reply to this one ....]
>
In wondering, in my newbie way, why Postgresql wouldn't be outputting to
"the Net," i.e. to my own machine but in TCP/IP, I read over Owen's start-up
script "/etc/rc.d/init.d/postgresql start" to see that all the stuff
mentioned in it in fact exists. It seems to.
What is more puzzling is that the script even checks for whether or not
"$(NETWORKING)= "no" && exit 0" which sounds like it ought to be doing the
right thing. Yet PGAccess won't start, except with Oliver's cunning
workaround -- suggesting that postmaster is not running in Net mode.
How can this be? Isn't this a contradiction of some sort?
-dlj.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David Lloyd-Jones | 2000-08-02 02:46:35 | Re: And Furthermore. Was: PSQL Working, but PGAccess Not Connecting. |
Previous Message | Bill | 2000-08-02 00:45:25 | Here's a fix for the ODBC problem with Large Objects |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jerome Raupach | 2000-08-02 07:55:20 | copy with libpq? |
Previous Message | David Lloyd-Jones | 2000-08-02 00:42:12 | Re: PSQL Working, but PGAccess Not Connecting. |