Re: file system and raid performance

From: "Gregory S(dot) Youngblood" <greg(at)tcscs(dot)com>
To: <david(at)lang(dot)hm>, "'Mark Wong'" <markwkm(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "'Gabrielle Roth'" <gorthx(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: file system and raid performance
Date: 2008-08-05 05:56:06
Message-ID: !&!AAAAAAAAAAAYAAAAAAAAAN6d+lQFliBLjc3jO6z0BSQigQAAEAAAANfJrgYhPS5AitwJ4U3L0vgBAAAAAA==@tcscs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

I recently ran some tests on Ubuntu Hardy Server (Linux) comparing JFS, XFS,
and ZFS+FUSE. It was all 32-bit and on old hardware, plus I only used
bonnie++, so the numbers are really only useful for my hardware.

What parameters were used to create the XFS partition in these tests? And,
what options were used to mount the file system? Was the kernel 32-bit or
64-bit? Given what I've seen with some of the XFS options (like lazy-count),
I am wondering about the options used in these tests.

Thanks,
Greg

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mark Wong 2008-08-05 14:57:58 Re: file system and raid performance
Previous Message david 2008-08-05 05:04:42 Re: file system and raid performance