Re: default privileges

From: Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: default privileges
Date: 2010-04-05 02:34:02
Message-ID: z2u3073cc9b1004041934p2b736e7fx32431ab804cde10f@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Apr 4, 2010 at 9:59 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec> writes:
>> On Sat, Apr 3, 2010 at 5:27 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>> Not sure if this is good enough or we need to provide some more-obvious
>>> way of dealing with it.
>
>> it's strange that a REVOKE doesn't clean what a GRANT did, and DROP
>> OWNED BY seems very dangerous (at least if i forgot to make REASSIGN
>> OWNED first).
>
> Agreed --- I fixed it so that granting or revoking back to the default
> permissions set will remove the entry.
>

ah! now is working nice... thanks

--
Atentamente,
Jaime Casanova
Soporte y capacitación de PostgreSQL
Asesoría y desarrollo de sistemas
Guayaquil - Ecuador
Cel. +59387171157

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2010-04-05 02:50:40 Re: Compile fail, alpha5 & gcc 4.3.3 in elog.c
Previous Message Tom Lane 2010-04-05 02:17:42 Re: Release Notes 9.0: substring() changes?