| From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | perltidy |
| Date: | 2010-04-19 15:02:10 |
| Message-ID: | z2g9837222c1004190802je7648c5ekc72c359cd1c1e30e@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
The MSVC scripts currently have a "perltidy coding style" so we run
perltidy with a specific set of arguments to format the code. (This is
in the README). Kind of like pgindent.
Should we be doing this on all the perlscripts we use?
And if we do, we should obviously use the same one everywhere -
probably just use the one we have for the msvc stuff today. Anything
in particular about that one that people hate?
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2010-04-19 15:04:00 | Re: Re: [BUGS] BUG #4887: inclusion operator (@>) on tsqeries behaves not conforming to documentation |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2010-04-19 15:00:18 | Re: Standalone backends run StartupXLOG in an incorrect environment |