From: | teg(at)redhat(dot)com (Trond Eivind =?iso-8859-1?q?Glomsr=F8d?=) |
---|---|
To: | Alex Knight <knight(at)phunc(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tim Barnard <tbarnard(at)povn(dot)com>, <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL |
Date: | 2001-06-27 21:16:12 |
Message-ID: | xuyels5d3oj.fsf@halden.devel.redhat.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Alex Knight <knight(at)phunc(dot)com> writes:
> 1) Distribution of Linux to have the largest number of "out of the box"
> security holes. Check back and look at the security reports. Count them if
> you insist.
And check for the number of them being Red Hat specific.
>
> 2) Most commercial software made _for_ RedHat (some companies only
> "support" RedHat) insist that you use RPM to install their software,
> otherwise you are SOL. Most commercial software made _for_ _Linux_
> supports all distributions.
That depends very much on the level of support you're giving - for a
big, complex you want to support as few environments as possible. You
can use it other places, but won't be supported to the same degree.
> 3) So much extra crap running to begin with, eating up extra memory, cpu,
> etc.
You're obviously unfamiliar with it.
> I'm sure we could go on, but this isn't a Linux list :)
Agreed. And of course, it isn't very interesting to discuss with
someone who is unfamiliar with the product.
--
Trond Eivind Glomsrød
Red Hat, Inc.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-06-27 21:17:51 | Re: Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL |
Previous Message | Lamar Owen | 2001-06-27 21:13:43 | Re: Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL |