Re: 3rd RFD: comp.databases.postgresql (was: comp.databases.postgresql.*)

On 3 Dec 2004 20:34:36 GMT, Woodchuck Bill <bwr607(at)hotmail(dot)com> wrote:

>David Harmon <source(at)netcom(dot)com> wrote in
>news:41c44692(dot)42645781(at)news(dot)west(dot)earthlink(dot)net:
>
>> On Fri, 3 Dec 2004 00:29:40 +0000 (UTC) in news.groups, Marc G.
>> Fournier From: <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> wrote,
>>>The pgsql.* hierarchy is a not a private one, it is a public one
>>>carried by several of the large usenet servers.
>>
>> What are the rules for creating new groups in pgsgl.*?
>>
>>
>
>Fiat-only by Marc. ;-)

I think that the term that is occasionally used is that the hierarchy
has a hierarchy czar. That is the most straightforward way to manage
a hierarchy. I did not say that it was the best or the worst, only
the most straightforward. It doesn't address the question of what
happens if the czar disappears, for instance.

- - Bob McClenon