Re: What has happened to pgxs?

From: Thomas Hallgren <thhal(at)mailblocks(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: What has happened to pgxs?
Date: 2005-09-22 16:45:45
Message-ID: thhal-0PHgOBLtc8bQq6lvrC5i/+XRjeVvLIf@mailblocks.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian wrote:

>Thomas Hallgren wrote:
>
>
>>Hi,
>>I tried to compile PL/Java against PostgreSQL 8.1beta2. I use pgxs and
>>until now that has been just fine. Now pgxs suggests that the include
>>files reside under /usr/local/pgsql. They don't of course. Not on my
>>windows box anyway :-)
>>
>>I think it stems from the src/Makefile.global. On line 59 it reads:
>>
>>prefix := /usr/local/pgsql
>>
>>I guess I'm missing something. Can someone explain to me what I need to
>>change?
>>
>>
>
>Take a look at Makefile.global.in. That value is defined by the
>--prefix flag when you run configure. The default is /usr/local/pgsql,
>and I am guessing you need to change that default on Win32.
>
>
>
I'm using a pre-compiled installation of PostgreSQL. All I want to do is
use pgxs to be able to compile PL/Java.

There is other stuff that seems strange to me. Why do you append
'postgresql' to the include directories further down in the file? I had
to remove that in order to compile.

Regards,
Thomas Hallgren

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2005-09-22 17:15:04 Re: Why does VACUUM FULL bother locking pages?
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2005-09-22 16:33:26 Re: What has happened to pgxs?