Re: libpq and prepared statements progress for 8.0

From: Gary Doades <gpd(at)cwcom(dot)net>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: libpq and prepared statements progress for 8.0
Date: 2004-09-16 08:20:25
Message-ID: t1jik0lrbbt6jotjbbh997nd0h5dif9o0e@4ax.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, 15 Sep 2004 13:50:43 -0400, tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us (Tom Lane)
wrote:

>
>Well, (a) I ran out of time, and (b) I wasn't sure what the most
>convenient API would be. Should we create something that packages
>together a Parse and a Describe Statement, or expose those as
>separate things?
>
>There's surely no technical difficulty once you've got some consensus
>on what the API should look like.
>
>
> regards, tom lane

Having a separate Parse and Describe would fit neatly with the ODBC
model. Hopefully the ODBC driver will get worked on in the medium term
to use libpq.

Regards,
Gary.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gavin Sherry 2004-09-16 08:29:27 Re: subtransaction assert failure
Previous Message Neil Conway 2004-09-16 07:32:30 subtransaction assert failure