| From: | Manfred Koizar <mkoi-pg(at)aon(dot)at> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "scott(dot)marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com>, Vivek Khera <khera(at)kcilink(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, Andrew Rawnsley <ronz(at)ravensfield(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: State of Beta 2 |
| Date: | 2003-09-12 13:52:36 |
| Message-ID: | sui3mv8mj7rmrp6qdmqiq5jsph4sv7q2hl@email.aon.at |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Thu, 11 Sep 2003 00:25:53 -0400, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
wrote:
>"int8col = 42" isn't indexable. [...] --- maybe
>just taking out the int8-vs-int4 comparison operators would improve
>matters. I might be willing to advocate another initdb to do that,
You mean
DELETE FROM pg_operator WHERE oid in (15, 36, 416, 417);
and possibly some more oids? Does this really require an initdb? If
we were willing to tell people who roll a 7.4Beta2 database cluster
into 7.4Beta3 (or 7.4 production) to execute this query once per
database, we could get away without increasing CATALOG_VERSION_NO.
Servus
Manfred
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dennis Gearon | 2003-09-12 14:01:39 | Re: selecting random rows |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-09-12 13:33:05 | Re: psql prompt |