Re: When it is better to use "timestamp without time zone"?

From: Andrew - Supernews <andrew+nonews(at)supernews(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: When it is better to use "timestamp without time zone"?
Date: 2006-01-04 14:41:24
Message-ID: slrndrnnkk.2iki.andrew+nonews@atlantis.supernews.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 2006-01-04, Emi Lu <emilu(at)cs(dot)concordia(dot)ca> wrote:
> In postgreSQL, the default value for timestamp is "without time zone".

That's true only because the SQL standard says so, not because it's actually
a good idea to use timestamps without time zone.

> Can I say when data is used among diff time zones, timestamp with time
> zone is a MUST; otherwise, timestamp without time zone is used?

No. You should, IMO, use timestamp with time zone in essentially all cases.
(In particular, you should _always_ use it for recording the time at which
an event happened, which covers most uses of timestamps.) Only use timestamp
without time zone for data storage if you have a specific reason to do so.

--
Andrew, Supernews
http://www.supernews.com - individual and corporate NNTP services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Emi Lu 2006-01-04 15:07:54 Re: When it is better to use "timestamp without time zone"?
Previous Message Emi Lu 2006-01-04 14:26:09 Re: When it is better to use "timestamp without time zone"?