Re: Must be owner to truncate?

From: Andrew - Supernews <andrew+nonews(at)supernews(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Must be owner to truncate?
Date: 2005-07-07 18:52:39
Message-ID: slrndcqufn.13l5.andrew+nonews@trinity.supernews.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2005-07-07, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> wrote:
>
>> * truncate is not MVCC-safe.
>
> Erm, that's why it gets a stronger lock, so I don't really see what
> this has to do with it.

It's not MVCC-safe even with the AccessExclusive lock; it damages snapshots
that were taken before the truncate operation but which don't have a lock
on the table yet. The only reason it doesn't break pg_dump is that the
first thing that pg_dump does is to take AccessShare locks on every table
that it's going to dump.

--
Andrew, Supernews
http://www.supernews.com - individual and corporate NNTP services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2005-07-07 19:30:35 8.1dev ssl broke?
Previous Message David Fetter 2005-07-07 18:17:07 Re: SQL99 - Nested Tables