Re: Humor me: Postgresql vs. MySql (esp. licensing)

From: Harald Fuchs <nospam(at)sap(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Humor me: Postgresql vs. MySql (esp. licensing)
Date: 2003-10-09 11:28:29
Message-ID: pu65iyveea.fsf@srv.protecting.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

In article <20031009030518(dot)GD8265(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>,
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl> writes:

> It was not clear to me from the article that originally mentioned it
> that it had an uncommitted transaction, though it may very well be the
> case.

Sridhar mentioned MyISAM tables - thus no transactions at all.

> But given that ROLLBACK takes some unreasonable amount of time in MySQL,
> what do you really expect? Did the rollback work when the poweroff was
> requested? Or did it work only halfway, rendering the whole
> "transaction" model useless?

Been there, done that. You can kill the MySQL server when it's
rolling back a huge transaction. When you restart it, it just
continues the rollback.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Harald Fuchs 2003-10-09 11:33:39 Re: Humor me: Postgresql vs. MySql (esp. licensing)
Previous Message Agostinho Sousa 2003-10-09 10:22:37 Re: help with large objects in 7.3.4