| From: | "Henry B(dot) Hotz" <hotz(at)jpl(dot)nasa(dot)gov> |
|---|---|
| To: | ljb <ljb220(at)mindspring(dot)com>, pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Request temporary freeze of libpgtcl chapter in manual |
| Date: | 2004-02-21 23:01:04 |
| Message-ID: | p05210601bc5d935a3ce3@[192.168.0.134] |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-www |
At 1:01 AM +0000 2/20/04, ljb wrote:
>I would like to request that no changes be made to the libpgtcl
>chapter in the PostgreSQL reference manual, at least for the near term,
>beyond file revision 1.40 in CVS. Otherwise, I can't promise any changes
>you make will end up in my version of the manual, in the event that the
>unbundling effort is successful. Is this OK?
I'm not contributing, so it's not an issue for me.
However isn't the whole point of CVS to make re-merging changes like this easy?
--
The opinions expressed in this message are mine,
not those of Caltech, JPL, NASA, or the US Government.
Henry(dot)B(dot)Hotz(at)jpl(dot)nasa(dot)gov, or hbhotz(at)oxy(dot)edu
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Paul Makepeace | 2004-02-23 12:11:05 | UPDATE FROM syntax |
| Previous Message | Jeroen Ruigrok/asmodai | 2004-02-21 20:57:15 | Re: jade X openjade |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Brett Schwarz | 2004-02-22 01:41:22 | Re: tcl on gborg |
| Previous Message | Dave Page | 2004-02-21 20:44:11 | Re: PDF docs in CVS broken |