From: | PFC <lists(at)boutiquenumerique(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Recursive queries |
Date: | 2005-01-26 23:59:58 |
Message-ID: | opsk8h98evth1vuj@musicbox |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Check out ltree
http://www.sai.msu.su/~megera/postgres/gist/ltree/
On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 22:03:58 +0100, tmp <skrald(at)amossen(dot)dk> wrote:
>> I don't think anybody has written the syntactic sugar, but someone did
>> write a function that provides equivalent output.
>
> I think it is important that the funcionality lies in the database
> engine itself: In that way it can more efficiently make use of the
> optimizer.
>
> Also, I think this "recursive" feature is *the* most important upcoming
> improvements: Currently there are simply no efficient way of fetching
> linked structures, which however is quite common in many areas.
>
> Regards
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if
> your
> joining column's datatypes do not match
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Vladimir S. Petukhov | 2005-01-27 00:16:14 | Re: Lower case |
Previous Message | PFC | 2005-01-26 23:57:25 | Re: Extended unit |