Re: Using oids

From: Malcolm Warren <malcolm(at)villeinitalia(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Using oids
Date: 2003-09-03 09:39:14
Message-ID: opruw3roxaoa2ek7@10.0.0.1
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

On Wed, 03 Sep 2003 11:28:01 +0200, Bo Lorentsen <bl(at)netgroup(dot)dk> wrote:

> On Wed, 2003-09-03 at 11:10, Shridhar Daithankar wrote:
>
>> Yes. It is correct. As of 7.3.x and onwards oids are optional at table
>> creation times. They default to be available for new objects but that is
>> for backwards compatibility I believe. In future, they would default to
>> be not available for a particular object(hopefully). Right now you need
>> to explicitly specify no oids while creating tables etc.

The point about oids is that they are so useful that many people have used
them extensively, me included.
And I did so on the basis of a book written by Bruce Mowjian, one of
Postgresql's major contributors.

If we are saying that there will always be backwards compatibility then I
can sleep at night.
If we are saying that at some point oids will exist no more then all of a
sudden I am going to have to re-write an awful lot of code.

Malcolm Warren

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amin Schoeib 2003-09-03 09:44:30 ERROR: PLPGSQL does not exist
Previous Message Shridhar Daithankar 2003-09-03 09:38:23 Re: Using oids

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bo Lorentsen 2003-09-03 10:20:42 Re: Using oids
Previous Message Shridhar Daithankar 2003-09-03 09:38:23 Re: Using oids