Re: Why not install pgstattuple by default?

From: "Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson" <johann(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: "PostgreSQL Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Why not install pgstattuple by default?
Date: 2011-05-07 14:07:38
Message-ID: op.vu36u0sauxs6vk@localhost
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, 06 May 2011 20:06:04 -0000, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

> Bundling pg_config into a -libs package is probably not going to happen,
> at least not on Red Hat systems, because it would create multilib issues
> (ie, you're supposed to be able to install 32-bit and 64-bit libraries
> concurrently, but there's noplace to put a /usr/bin file without causing
> a conflict).

There is no separate directory for 64bit binaries like /usr/bin and
/usr/bin/amd64 on Solaris? And even in the absence of such a convention
I'd still like to have both 32bit and 64bit binaries of the server/client
available.

I have a feeling this topic is digressing a bit.

--
Johann Oskarsson http://www.2ndquadrant.com/ |[]
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services --+--
|
Blog: http://my.opera.com/myrkraverk/blog/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2011-05-07 16:21:12 Re: Fix for pg_upgrade user flag
Previous Message Robert Haas 2011-05-07 13:56:13 Re: patch for new feature: Buffer Cache Hibernation