Re: count function alternative in postgres

From: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
Cc: junaidmalik14 <junaidmalik14(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: count function alternative in postgres
Date: 2010-04-05 17:01:10
Message-ID: n2p162867791004051001sf0c4adb5t1ad954c03267b549@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

2010/4/5 Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> You can do:
>>
>> SELECT COUNT(*) FROM (SELECT DISTINCT profile.id, profile.name,
>> profile.age FROM ...) x;
>
> Ah, I see what they wanted now.  In older versions of PostgreSQL,
> they might get better performance in some cases by using GROUP BY:
>
> SELECT COUNT(*) FROM
>  (SELECT id, name, age FROM profile GROUP BY id, name, age) x;
>
> I don't remember offhand what version started considering a hash for
> DISTINCT.
>
8.4

http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.4/static/release-8-4.html

regards
Pavel

> -Kevin
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2010-04-05 18:29:46 Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Check compulsory parameters in recovery.conf in standby_mode, per
Previous Message Kevin Grittner 2010-04-05 16:29:52 Re: count function alternative in postgres