Re: Ready to branch 7.2/7.3 ?

From: Doug McNaught <doug(at)wireboard(dot)com>
To: Greg Copeland <greg(at)CopelandConsulting(dot)Net>
Cc: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, Justin Clift <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Ready to branch 7.2/7.3 ?
Date: 2002-02-18 20:41:11
Message-ID: m3wuxah6ag.fsf@varsoon.denali.to
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Greg Copeland <greg(at)CopelandConsulting(dot)Net> writes:

> I guess I jumped the gun in my previous message as I hadn't read this
> one yet. I completely agree with Marc on this topic. What is the logic
> for simply not snap-shoting what really is 7.2 and move on with 7.3
> while allowing 7.2.x to occur on the branch for migration on a later
> day?

If you don't branch immediately, then bugfixes only have to be done
once. So it makes some sense to let things stabilize for a little
while after a general release.

-Doug
--
Let us cross over the river, and rest under the shade of the trees.
--T. J. Jackson, 1863

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2002-02-18 20:41:25 Re: Serious 7.2 issue (non quiet string truncation)
Previous Message Rod Taylor 2002-02-18 20:28:15 Re: Serious 7.2 issue (non quiet string truncation)