Re: PlPython

From: Doug McNaught <doug(at)mcnaught(dot)org>
To: Ron Johnson <ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PlPython
Date: 2003-06-26 17:35:07
Message-ID: m3wuf84u9g.fsf@varsoon.wireboard.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

Ron Johnson <ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net> writes:

> On Thu, 2003-06-26 at 11:59, Tom Lane wrote:

> > Now that the rexec code is gone, it MUST be marked untrusted --- this is
> > not a question for debate. Installing it as trusted would be a security
> > hole.
>
> In what version is rexec removed? v2.3? If so, then there are
> many people with Python 2.2 and even 2.1 who could still use
> trusted PlPython.

No--rexec was removed in 2.3 because it was found to be unfixably
insecure, not because 2.3 broke anything. Earlier versions are just as
insecure.

-Doug

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Paul Ramsey 2003-06-26 17:36:09 pg_dump "all tables" in 7.3.X
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-06-26 17:34:13 Re: PlPython

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Paul Ramsey 2003-06-26 17:36:09 pg_dump "all tables" in 7.3.X
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-06-26 17:34:13 Re: PlPython