Re: help with getting index scan

From: Doug McNaught <doug(at)wireboard(dot)com>
To: "Thomas T(dot) Thai" <tom(at)minnesota(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: help with getting index scan
Date: 2002-02-25 15:38:13
Message-ID: m3pu2tzi56.fsf@varsoon.denali.to
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

"Thomas T. Thai" <tom(at)minnesota(dot)com> writes:

> > > i can't seem to get index scan to work on table phone_cat_address. here
> > > are my schemas:
> >
> > Standard question: have you run VACUUM ANALYZE?
>
> yes :) before each test.

Excellent. ;)

>
> > Also, the estimate of rows returned from the phone_cat_address scan is
> > pretty large--how large is the table itself? Sequential scan is
> > actually faster if you're going to end up returning most of the rows
> > in the table...
>
> yellowpages=# select count(*) from phone_cat_address;
> count
> --------
> 336702
> (1 row)
>
> type typical results should be a tiny fraction of that number.

Well, EXPLAIN is indicating (unless I misread it) that the estimate of
rows returned is 336702, so it's not surprising that it opts for a
sequential scan. Is this under 7.1 or 7.2? The latter keeps much
better statistics about table populations...

-Doug
--
Let us cross over the river, and rest under the shade of the trees.
--T. J. Jackson, 1863

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2002-02-25 15:38:38 Re: template Database
Previous Message Darren Ferguson 2002-02-25 15:33:08 Re: Help with two table query