Re: [HACKERS] Warning!!

From: Bruce Stephens <bruce(at)cenderis(dot)demon(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Warning!!
Date: 1998-11-04 22:54:43
Message-ID: m3g1bzkr0s.fsf@cenderis.demon.co.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

A James Lewis <james(at)vrtx(dot)net> writes:

> Sorry, should have been the first thing to say...
>
> Linux 2.0.29
> GCC 2.7.2
> /lib/libc.so.5.3.12
>
> For some reason it won't compile on my newer system GCC 2.8.1/glibc but
> I'll look at that when I have some time....

I just tried the same example on 6.4beta4, with linux2.0.36pre
something, glibc and egcs1.1. (It compiled fine, for what it's
worth.)

I also get this erroneous behaviour:

postgres=> select cash_mul_flt8('$1', '123.77');
cash_mul_flt8
-------------
$123.76
(1 row)

and

postgres=> select cash_mul_flt8('$1', '123.99');
cash_mul_flt8
-------------
$123.98
(1 row)

This may be sense from a numerical analysis point of view, but it
suggests there's a problem somewhere: this is surely behaving in a
surprising way.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message The Hermit Hacker 1998-11-04 23:50:04 Open the flood gates...v6.4 is tag'd...
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 1998-11-04 22:13:02 Re: [HACKERS] latest snapshot crashes backend