Re: pgsql and large tables

From: Doug McNaught <doug(at)wireboard(dot)com>
To: "Gurupartap Davis" <partap(at)yahoo(dot)com>
Cc: "Francisco Reyes" <lists(at)natserv(dot)com>, "pgsql General List" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pgsql and large tables
Date: 2001-11-16 01:39:04
Message-ID: m3d72jbikn.fsf@belphigor.mcnaught.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

"Gurupartap Davis" <partap(at)yahoo(dot)com> writes:

> Sheesh...I think I see what you're saying about normalization. I've never
> had a formal db class, but it looks like you're talking about removing all
> the redundancy from the database...and there's a lot in this one(!)

[...]

> Dang...I don't know if my employer will let me make a change this radical,
> though. We would have to redo every single query in about 50 scripts.

You might be able to define views and rules in such a way that old
queries still work, or work with minor changes.

-Doug
--
Let us cross over the river, and rest under the shade of the trees.
--T. J. Jackson, 1863

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Barry Lind 2001-11-16 01:51:39 bug or change in functionality in 7.2?
Previous Message Gurupartap Davis 2001-11-16 01:01:36 Re: pgsql and large tables