Re: Hot Standby 0.2.1

From: Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Hot Standby 0.2.1
Date: 2009-09-18 14:20:20
Message-ID: m2zl8s8hcr.fsf@hi-media.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Also, stepping back from me personally, should we try to assign some
> additional reviewers to these patches? Is there some way we can
> divide up review tasks among multiple people so that we're not
> repeating each others work?
>
> Thoughts appreciated, from Heikki, Simon, or others.

How about this proposal:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2009-08/msg00764.php

Regards,
--
dim

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff Janes 2009-09-18 14:23:33 Re: Hot Standby 0.2.1
Previous Message Marcelo Costa 2009-09-18 14:02:41 Re: happy birthday Tom Lane ...