Re: Extension Packaging

From: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers\(at)postgresql(dot)org Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Daniele Varrazzo <daniele(dot)varrazzo(at)gmail(dot)com>, Marko Kreen <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr>
Subject: Re: Extension Packaging
Date: 2011-05-12 07:29:26
Message-ID: m2d3jofkbt.fsf@2ndQuadrant.fr
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> Okay, how we add a "revision" key to the control file and extrevision to
>> the pg_extension catalog. Its type can be "TEXT" and is optional for use
>> by extensions.
>
> How would pg_extension.extrevision be kept up to date? AFAICS, the
> whole point is that you might swap out the shared libraries without
> doing anything at the SQL level.

Well, ALTER EXTENSION UPDATE could be taught to check for control file
changes only when there's no upgrade script. I think it already did
that for some fields, like require and comment, but it's no longer the
case.

Still, I would think that it should be possible to update some metadata
of the extension without running an SQL upgrade script.

Regards,
--
Dimitri Fontaine
http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dean Rasheed 2011-05-12 07:42:22 Re: Tables cannot have INSTEAD OF triggers
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2011-05-12 07:04:31 Re: