Re: Transactions over pathological TCP connections

From: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr>
To: Leon Smith <leon(dot)p(dot)smith(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Transactions over pathological TCP connections
Date: 2012-06-22 12:28:26
Message-ID: m2d34rfs45.fsf@2ndQuadrant.fr
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Leon Smith <leon(dot)p(dot)smith(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> It's not clear to me that this is even a solvable problem without modifying
> the schema to include both a "taken" and a "finished processing" state,
> and then letting elements be re-delievered after a period of time.

You maybe should have a look at PGQ from Skytools before reinventing it.

Regards,
--
Dimitri Fontaine
http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2012-06-22 13:02:53 Re: [PATCH] Add some more documentation for array indexes/operators
Previous Message Florian Pflug 2012-06-22 11:11:00 Re: COMMUTATOR doesn't seem to work