Re: Truncate if exists

From: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)gmail(dot)com>, Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Truncate if exists
Date: 2012-10-15 19:35:26
Message-ID: m28vb7r0jl.fsf@2ndQuadrant.fr
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> WITH target AS (
>> TRUNCATE TABLE t FROM target;
>
> I'm not exactly sure what that is supposed to do, but it doesn't seem
> like an easy-to-use substitute for truncate-if-exists...

Indeed. I'm still a supporter of truncate-if-exists. Still, we're also
talking about a more flexible and powerful design, it seems to me.

> I like the idea of making our SQL dialect capable of working with DDL
> in more powerful ways; I'm not sold on the concrete proposal.

Cool,
--
Dimitri Fontaine
http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2012-10-15 19:38:50 Re: smgrsettransient mechanism is full of bugs
Previous Message Andres Freund 2012-10-15 19:25:08 Re: [RFC][PATCH] wal decoding, attempt #2 - Design Documents (really attached)