From: | Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: ALTER EXTENSION UPGRADE, v3 |
Date: | 2011-02-10 21:14:05 |
Message-ID: | m262srfv8i.fsf@2ndQuadrant.fr |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> No, you have to get *those other module authors* to make *their*
> extensions not relocatable so that you can depend on them.
Just tell me exactly in which world an extension's author is setting up
the dependencies in the 'required' property and yet fails to realise
that those dependencies mean his extension is not relocatable? And
will refuse to fix the problem when bugs are filled?
I'm not following your reasonning…
--
Dimitri Fontaine
http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2011-02-10 21:17:51 | Re: ALTER EXTENSION UPGRADE, v3 |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2011-02-10 21:12:12 | Re: Why we don't want hints Was: Slow count(*) again... |