Re: psql's \dn versus temp schemas

From: Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: psql's \dn versus temp schemas
Date: 2010-09-24 21:24:51
Message-ID: m239syal7g.fsf@hi-media.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> In that case, in a fresh database you would *only* see "public".
> I'm not sure that I like this though. Comments?

I sure like it! I can't count how many time I would have wanted a
"cleaned out" \dn output.

Regards,
--
dim

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2010-09-24 21:34:10 Re: pgsql: git_topo_order script, to match up commits across branches.
Previous Message Kevin Grittner 2010-09-24 21:19:14 Re: Review: Row-level Locks & SERIALIZABLE transactions, postgres vs. Oracle