Re: [HACKERS] RE: [INTERFACES] Re: SSL patch

From: "D'Arcy" "J(dot)M(dot)" Cain <darcy(at)druid(dot)net>
To: hannu(at)trust(dot)ee (Hannu Krosing)
Cc: Michael(dot)Ansley(at)intec(dot)co(dot)za, maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us, tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us, scrappy(at)hub(dot)org, mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] RE: [INTERFACES] Re: SSL patch
Date: 1999-07-26 10:24:53
Message-ID: m118hwD-0000bFC@druid.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Thus spake Hannu Krosing
> Not to scare anyone away (I like crypto !;), but isn't it illegal to
> have SSL
> in an exportable product in US.
>
> I guess this should be kept in a separate patch distributed from an
> non-US site
> until US government wisens up.

The PostgreSQL server is in Canada. There may still be some issues but
last time I checked we weren't a US state yet.

--
D'Arcy J.M. Cain <darcy(at){druid|vex}.net> | Democracy is three wolves
http://www.druid.net/darcy/ | and a sheep voting on
+1 416 424 2871 (DoD#0082) (eNTP) | what's for dinner.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message D'Arcy J.M. Cain 1999-07-26 10:30:57 Re: [SQL] database design SQL prob.
Previous Message Jan Wieck 1999-07-26 10:18:06 Re: [HACKERS] plperl intial pass