Re: [HACKERS] Re: inet/cidr/bind

From: darcy(at)druid(dot)net (D'Arcy J(dot)M(dot) Cain)
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Cc: paul(at)vix(dot)com (Paul A Vixie)
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: inet/cidr/bind
Date: 1998-10-21 02:59:29
Message-ID: m0zVoUj-0000emC@druid.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Ok, I have posted the patches for the inet type functions and Bruce has
applied it. The functions added are inet_netmask(), inet_broadcast() and
inet_masklen(). The other ones I mentioned before don't apply to
this type.

Next issue is the names given to the functions in the user API. At
the moment they just have the same names as the underlying functions
but I think they should be netmask(), broadcast() and masklen().
Does anyone disagree?

--
D'Arcy J.M. Cain <darcy(at){druid|vex}.net> | Democracy is three wolves
http://www.druid.net/darcy/ | and a sheep voting on
+1 416 424 2871 (DoD#0082) (eNTP) | what's for dinner.

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 1998-10-21 03:11:32 Re: [HACKERS] CIDR/INET type and IANA/ICANN
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 1998-10-21 02:56:33 Re: Protections problem on CVS tree