| From: | darcy(at)druid(dot)net (D'Arcy J(dot)M(dot) Cain) |
|---|---|
| To: | maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us (Bruce Momjian) |
| Cc: | paul(at)vix(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Re: inet/cidr/bind |
| Date: | 1998-10-20 14:11:32 |
| Message-ID: | m0zVcVY-0000f9C@druid.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Thus spake Bruce Momjian
> If people really want the INET/CIDR type for 6.4, we are going to need
> tremendous effort to pull this off. That means good, clean code,
> documenation, and testing, regression tests, and soon.
Would it be helpful to discuss this in a more direct matter? I am sitting
in #postgreSQL on EFNet (IRC) if anyone wants to join me there.
--
D'Arcy J.M. Cain <darcy(at){druid|vex}.net> | Democracy is three wolves
http://www.druid.net/darcy/ | and a sheep voting on
+1 416 424 2871 (DoD#0082) (eNTP) | what's for dinner.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Hartwig | 1998-10-20 15:34:38 | Re: [INTERFACES] using indexes with the OR clause |
| Previous Message | Sferacarta Software | 1998-10-20 13:52:06 | using indexes with the OR clause |