hash indexes and HS was:(Re: [HACKERS] testing hot standby)

From: Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec>
To: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: hash indexes and HS was:(Re: [HACKERS] testing hot standby)
Date: 2010-04-13 15:41:08
Message-ID: l2p3073cc9b1004130841u8f9bde9aj328e9ef8bb649d53@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 1:23 AM, Jaime Casanova
<jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec> wrote:
>
> another point, what happened with this:
> http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/1229549172.4793.105.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant?
> Obviously we still have the problem with hash indexes, and in that
> thread Tom advice was just to document the issue and while that could
> be fine at least we should be emitting better messages, consider this
> one that i got on the standby server (where 4658650 is the oid of a
> hash index):
> """
> mic=# explain analyze select * from tt1 where col1 = 5000;
> ERROR:  could not read block 0 in file "base/21958/4658650": read only
> 0 of 8192 bytes
> """
>

--
Atentamente,
Jaime Casanova
Soporte y capacitación de PostgreSQL
Asesoría y desarrollo de sistemas
Guayaquil - Ecuador
Cel. +59387171157

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2010-04-13 15:49:12 Re: Remaining Streaming Replication Open Items
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2010-04-13 14:18:54 Re: Hot Standby: Startup at shutdown checkpoint