From: | Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Anj Adu <fotographs(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Iñigo Martinez Lasala <imartinez(at)vectorsf(dot)com>, pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: more 10K disks or less 15K disks |
Date: | 2010-04-28 22:12:51 |
Message-ID: | k2pdcc563d11004281512s22ea3095m50f328bdcdf7e5a2@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 3:18 PM, Anj Adu <fotographs(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Thank you all for the comments
>
> We have not benchmarked the new hardware yet..however..we do have
> existing hardware that deals with very high volumes and handle pretty
> well (Dell 2950 Intel 5430 8-cores with 6x450G 15K disks and 32G RAM -
> Perc 6iRaid controllers) with minimal IO wait . there are ususally
> about10-15 threads running at peak time with an average of 4-10
> threads overall.
>
> We are looking at high density boxes due to increasing storage requirements.
I assume the 24 2.5" box is the supermicro 2U machine? Those are
quite impressive little chassis's. If you need something bigger, take
a look at this:
http://www.aberdeeninc.com/abcatg/Stirling-X881.htm
You can add up to 8 16 disk JBOD boxes to it if needs be as well.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Greg Smith | 2010-04-29 01:12:10 | Re: more 10K disks or less 15K disks |
Previous Message | Anj Adu | 2010-04-28 21:18:19 | Re: more 10K disks or less 15K disks |