Re: [GENERAL] One-click installer, Windows 7 32-bit, and icacls.exe

From: Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] One-click installer, Windows 7 32-bit, and icacls.exe
Date: 2011-10-03 08:42:08
Message-ID: j6bsgs$hjr$1@dough.gmane.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-general

Dave Page wrote on 03.10.2011 10:11:
> Karl; can you please provide precise details of your Windows version,
> and anything unusual about your disk configuration? I know this
> doesn't happen on any of the installations of Windows 7 that we use
> for testing (which tend to be the MSDN builds, running on local NTFS
> disks), so I wonder if there's an icacls bug in a specific build or
> rev of Windows, or when used on a certain type of filesystem.
>

I have reported this as well some weeks ago.
For me this happened on a Windows7 64 bit system that is part of a domain (all current MS patches applied)
UAC is turned off, I was logged in as a local administrator (*not* a domain administrator).

I have a ProcessMonitor trace that shows the behaviour of what icacls is doing when started by the installer.
It is available here: http://www.sql-workbench.net/icacls_trace.zip

Regards
Thomas

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2011-10-03 10:47:58 bug in dependency - there is possibility to break a system catalog
Previous Message Dave Page 2011-10-03 08:11:55 Re: [GENERAL] One-click installer, Windows 7 32-bit, and icacls.exe

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message 姜头 2011-10-03 09:03:22 How can i get record by data block not by sql?
Previous Message Sim Zacks 2011-10-03 08:14:57 Re: PL/Python