From: | dalgoda(at)ix(dot)netcom(dot)com (Mike Castle) |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: size of NULL field? |
Date: | 2002-04-18 01:09:21 |
Message-ID: | hr2l9a.ldh.ln@thune.mrc-home.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
In article <200204151933(dot)g3FJXT912721(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>,
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>Oh, I didn't realize the size of the NULL bitmask was zero if no nulls
>exist. Nice.
So, how does the row know if the NULL bitmask exists or not? I'm guessing
there's a structure per row somewhere that has as at least one of it's
members, a bit on whether a NULL bitmask exists or not?
If all of the members of a row become non-NULL, does the NULL bitmask go
away?
mrc
--
Mike Castle dalgoda(at)ix(dot)netcom(dot)com www.netcom.com/~dalgoda/
We are all of us living in the shadow of Manhattan. -- Watchmen
fatal ("You are in a maze of twisty compiler features, all different"); -- gcc
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Thomas Lockhart | 2002-04-18 02:25:04 | Re: Date precision problem |
Previous Message | pgsql-gen Newsgroup (@Basebeans.com) | 2002-04-18 00:40:01 | Re: Poor performance with "large" table. |