Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Binaries vs Source

From: "Guido Barosio" <gbarosio(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Joshua Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: "PostgreSQL Advocacy" <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, w^3 <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Binaries vs Source
Date: 2008-09-09 18:02:06
Message-ID: f7f6b4c70809091102p1b490afofe3d4acb9cc33529@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-www

Joshua,

*... a surprise to me* ---> Though *compile* would beat other methods.

gb.-

On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 10:56 AM, Joshua Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Sep 2008 10:42:51 -0700
> "Guido Barosio" <gbarosio(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> Binary package from www.postgresql.org 121 33.799%
>> Through operating system update tool 127 35.475%
>> ~66%
>>
>> Compile from source 98 27.374%
>>
>> Hmmm, are we doing something with this information? I am not an expert
>> at all, but I reccon that these numbers are at least a surprise to me.
>>
>
> Why is it a surprise?
>
> --
> The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.commandprompt.com/
> PostgreSQL Community Conference: http://www.postgresqlconference.org/
> United States PostgreSQL Association: http://www.postgresql.us/
> Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
>
>
>

--
Guido Barosio
-----------------------
http://www.globant.com
guido(dot)barosio(at)globant(dot)com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua Drake 2008-09-09 18:06:19 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Binaries vs Source
Previous Message Joshua Drake 2008-09-09 17:56:00 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Binaries vs Source

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua Drake 2008-09-09 18:06:19 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Binaries vs Source
Previous Message Joshua Drake 2008-09-09 17:56:00 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Binaries vs Source