| From: | Joshua Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Guido Barosio" <gbarosio(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "PostgreSQL Advocacy" <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, w^3 <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Binaries vs Source |
| Date: | 2008-09-09 17:56:00 |
| Message-ID: | 20080909105600.22b93659@jd-laptop |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-www |
On Tue, 9 Sep 2008 10:42:51 -0700
"Guido Barosio" <gbarosio(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Binary package from www.postgresql.org 121 33.799%
> Through operating system update tool 127 35.475%
> ~66%
>
> Compile from source 98 27.374%
>
> Hmmm, are we doing something with this information? I am not an expert
> at all, but I reccon that these numbers are at least a surprise to me.
>
Why is it a surprise?
--
The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.commandprompt.com/
PostgreSQL Community Conference: http://www.postgresqlconference.org/
United States PostgreSQL Association: http://www.postgresql.us/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Guido Barosio | 2008-09-09 18:02:06 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Binaries vs Source |
| Previous Message | Guido Barosio | 2008-09-09 17:42:51 | Binaries vs Source |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Guido Barosio | 2008-09-09 18:02:06 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Binaries vs Source |
| Previous Message | Guido Barosio | 2008-09-09 17:42:51 | Binaries vs Source |