From: | "Guido Barosio" <gbarosio(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: swik.net is copying planetpostgresql content |
Date: | 2008-05-27 16:05:31 |
Message-ID: | f7f6b4c70805270905w18964a6cr8224a9ec58757db2@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
+1
I've said something pretty similar though, or that was my intention at least :)
gb.-
On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 1:00 PM, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
> Folks,
>
> "Never attribute to malice what can be explained by stupidity or inattention."
>
> As far as I can tell, SWiK is guilty of nothing worse that sloppiness. I see
> absolutely no reason to assume that they are trying to do something sinister.
> What would be their motivation?
>
> Further, SWiK *does* link back to the original blogs. So some of the argument
> posted here has been based on false premises.
>
> The alternative is to have SWiK not include PostgreSQL at all, which is not a
> good outcome for us. I think that we *might* send them a politely worded
> request to clarify their copyright statement (I'll be happy to do this).
> Beyond that, this seems like a real non-issue.
>
> --
> Josh Berkus
> PostgreSQL @ Sun
> San Francisco
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-advocacy mailing list (pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-advocacy
>
--
Guido Barosio
-----------------------
http://www.globant.com
guido(dot)barosio(at)globant(dot)com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2008-05-27 16:08:53 | Re: swik.net is copying planetpostgresql content |
Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2008-05-27 16:00:21 | Re: swik.net is copying planetpostgresql content |