This was one of the threads, but the discussion is not the one that I am after.
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 2:29 AM, Guido Barosio <gbarosio(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I was trying to find a thread where the discussion relied on the name,
> using PostgreSQL or just Postgres.
> AFAIK there was an agreement and PostgreSQL *won* that discussion, but
> I am unable to find that thread and I may be wrong. This comes to me
> because I was trying to push some *advocacy* stuff to the -es mailing
> list, and now I am not sure on how to proceeed.
> The case is that the .org FAQ explains that both names are just fine,
> and I am happy with that, but I seem to recall that PostgreSQL was the
> preferred option. Though, if this is the case we should change that
> from the site, right?
> Guido Barosio
In response to
pgsql-advocacy by date
|Next:||From: Robert Treat||Date: 2008-05-20 10:37:42|
|Subject: Re: PostgreSQL name|
|Previous:||From: Guido Barosio||Date: 2008-05-20 05:29:08|
|Subject: PostgreSQL name|