Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: PostgreSQL name

From: "Guido Barosio" <gbarosio(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "PostgreSQL Advocacy" <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL name
Date: 2008-05-20 05:52:19
Message-ID: f7f6b4c70805192252k5c793aa3i33cc7d3b40f6ef43@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy
This was one of the threads, but the discussion is not the one that I am after.

http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-advocacy/2008-01/msg00218.php

gb.-


On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 2:29 AM, Guido Barosio <gbarosio(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I was trying to find a thread where the discussion relied on the name,
> using PostgreSQL or just Postgres.
>
> AFAIK there was an agreement and PostgreSQL *won* that discussion, but
> I am unable to find that thread and I may be wrong. This comes to me
> because I was trying to push some *advocacy* stuff to the -es mailing
> list, and now I am not sure on how to proceeed.
>
> The case is that the .org FAQ explains that both names are just fine,
> and I am happy with that, but I seem to recall that PostgreSQL was the
> preferred option. Though, if this is the case we should change that
> from the site, right?
>
>
> --
> Guido Barosio
> -----------------------
> http://www.globant.com
> guido(dot)barosio(at)globant(dot)com
>



-- 
Guido Barosio
-----------------------
http://www.globant.com
guido(dot)barosio(at)globant(dot)com

In response to

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Robert TreatDate: 2008-05-20 10:37:42
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL name
Previous:From: Guido BarosioDate: 2008-05-20 05:29:08
Subject: PostgreSQL name

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group